Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 04:32

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Mariners' vibes turn ugly after sweep: 'Nobody feels sorry for us' - The Seattle Times
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
What’s next?
AMD has limited Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB sampling based on ‘regional market demand’ - VideoCardz.com
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
New Chemical Kills 95% of Termites and Can’t Harm Humans - SciTechDaily
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
How does a man look at you when he is in love?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Pocket is shutting down, so I switched to a self-hosted alternative - Android Authority
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What were some of the unforgettable incidents from your school life?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Popular chicken chain shares, massive expansion plan - TheStreet